Kaitlyn Bennett who was pretending to want this (she was pretending to be a radlib feminist) as she went undercover at UCLA https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=3167521346624232
Big Tech censorship I support this letter, its message and I add my signature to this letter . I also echo this article on it too I critique single-issue campaigns or orientations in the realm of idpol/ cancel culture left anarchism subreddit sidebar I will give the cancel culture warriors this minor acknowledgement; it is understandable that companies like big tech use canceling of users to avoid being associated with controversial views . But the fact they virtue signal about how they canceled such people for ‘moral’ reasons or to ‘protect protected groups’ means I will never even give those companies the benefit of the doubt. Cancel Culture is only a problem because of employment-at-will. https://www.reddit.com/r/stupidpol/comments/obm3x9/why_wont_the_establishment_press_accept_any/ Here is a similar point on Cancel culture I am against Cancel culture as much as the IDW are against it and I echo a lot of their views o...
NGOs (Liberal 2.0, and non Liberal 2.0 alike like Jewish NGOs like WJC splc and ADL ) have too much influence over our society. We shouldn’t have to bend the knee to NGOs ( andrew torba bend kneee jews gab )every time they whine about something us non Liberal 2.0s say that triggers them. The NGOs need to put in checked reduce their power and influence . NGOs even influence each other. Most NGOs are Liberal 2.0ers and we need to go after them and stop their abuse The SPLC has done great work for decades and is generally a good tool for info on hate groups but in the past decade (especially since they wrongly fired Morris Dees) they have a Liberal 2.0 bias, at least outside of their info on hate groups. They are seen by some to be almost a some scam and should be taken with a grain of salt after the acts they pulled over the years The SPLC listing pro life groups and Traditionalist Catholic groups as hate groups is proof they are moving towards being a ...
If I was born and raised on another planet, I would say “I am pro extraterrestrial WBIPOC adjacent” If I was born and raised on a similar planet in another solar system, galaxy or universe, on that planet I would say “(extraterrestrial) White adjacent Privilege is not real but if people want to believe it is real, that is their right to believe that. I would never stop them from believing that”. Then I would say on that similar planet in another solar system, galaxy or universe, “I think that we should counter such conspiracy theories in a peaceful, friendly and uplifting sort of way where we are not labeled racist or bigoted (if not we shouldn't counter that stuff). Besides labeling everything as 'privilege' will have a slippery slope effect which would backfire on (extraterrestrial) BIPOC adjacents so its a benefit for them not to label things as '(extraterrestrial) White adjacent Privilege' “ On other planets in other solar systems, galaxies and universes, I w...
Comments
Post a Comment