Polikckin Me

I view Chile’s Broad Front pandemic policy platform and laws since early 2020 as mid 90s to mid 00s Anti Hero (mid 90s- mid 00s Anti Heroes are more heroic and less bad than 90s Anti Heroes but still not as heroic or good as regular Anti Heroes). I feel if for no other reason that a country like Chile deserves those type of pandemic policies and laws (well that and because I am loyal to the left wing in Chile which includes Gabriel Boric's leftist parties and alliances) Russia had nothing to do with the Canadian trucker protest. Every bad thing that happens in the US/Canada is not because of Russia or Vladimir Putin. Only Russophobic crackpots would say otherwise I am mixed to pragmatically neutral on Bill Maher's late Oct 2021 view on natural immunity It's wrong , mean, and defamatory to call anti vaxxers or anti restriction/anti lockdown people 'pro co vid' or to want to deny them medical help.  Many people who are not hardcore right wingers have such views I am

 https://www.reddit.com/r/stupidpol/comments/u79qp5/dont_participate_in_identity_politics_transcend_it/ Maybe I should say 'don't participate in idpol but transcend it' But then I would be doing shitlib handwringing by saying that  . But "the rightoids are the real enemy right?" I don't play favorites Liberal 2.0ers and right wingers are both equally cringe to me The real enemy is capitalism and people like shitlibs who believe the political categories of liberalism 2.0 (the Liberal 2.0 left, rightoids) are immanent and unmovable. Rather than seeking to understand why people are reactionary to ideologies that they rightly are seen as undermining their parental authority, shitlibs expect everyone to agree with their babyish moralizing because a few bad things happened to people they see as victims. And they might very well be victims, but so was Ashli Babbit, and some people have no problem calling her a whore. The Libs of Tik tok are a disease that people are

 stupidpol i don't really care if leftists and lean leftists who disagree with Liberal 2.0ers and or Democrats move to be right or left wing idpol. Both negative extremes can be easily identified by me, but also to be made pointless  stupidpol When true stakes start to return, when clear lines are drawn in the sand and class consciousness is felt once again, all of this fake nonsense will fade away  stupidpol My suggestion is to quit caring about as much of day-to-day politics as much as we are able to (like I was in the 1980s, 1990s, and most of the 2000s decade and early 2010s). its all a freaking show created to make you and me pick a side. to hell with that, keep our eyes on the prize  stupidpol I mean even the renowned socialist states would be considered “socially conservative” by Leftists and most Liberal 2.0ers today   stupidpol As leftists, we should promote some kind of sociocultural normalcy which is tolerant/liberal 2.0 yet opposed to hardcore things (I.e. gender ideolo

  https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/12/03/facebook-hate-speech/ https://www.reddit.com/r/stupidpol/comments/kbe392/facebook_hate_speech_against_whites_and_men_will/ From the article: "But before the overhaul, the company’s algorithms and policies did not make a distinction between groups that were more likely to be targets of hate speech versus those that have not been historically marginalized. Comments like “White people are stupid” were treated the same as anti-Semitic or racist slurs." I guess that white people haven't been historically marginalized, but according to Washington Post and Facebook, we can always start ...  White people were on the margins of Eurasia for a thousand years This is the magical variable placeholder that is used to justify any amount of revanchist political action undertaken in modern times Simply choose an arbitrary time period and place that when the group who is in question was powerful, and then claim to be positioned athwart

 tim pool subreddit:  The actual question is whether or not Liberal 2.0ers are actually liberal. Liberal 2.0ers, like "Woke" people are very much aligned with the same ideology of a 1960's "Conservative" or modern KKK member. Both groups like Liberal 2.0ers (or at least woke SJWs) advocate for racially segregated spaces/societies using statist (former and latter) and involuntary (latter) methods Both of these groups believe in racially monolithic generalizations. Both of these groups advocate for racially targeted legislation that is based off of those group generalizations. Both of those groups believe in innate privileges to being born white. Both of those groups believe they are victims. Both of those groups believe they deserve racially targeted reparations. Both of those groups deflect from Antifa violence. Both of those groups totally despise the State of Israel. Both of those groups advocate for economic Liberal 2.0 policies . Yes, I believe that Nick Fue

   Kaitlyn Bennett who was pretending to want this (she was pretending to be a radlib feminist) as she went undercover at UCLA https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=3167521346624232

  ttps://www.reddit.com/r/Libertarian/comments/ikpb7u/conservatives_you_are_not_libertarian_and_stop/ Libt reddit  ttps://www.reddit.com/r/Libertarian/comments/ikpb7u/conservatives_you_are_not_libertarian_and_stop/ i dont think conservatism is at its core directly linked to authoritarianism but it appears that the republican party is seeping themselves more and more in authoritarianism each year I am a left libertarian, but I’ve seen right wing libertarians who disagree with me on items and I always seek common ground because that’s the way you build a society - leave your pipe dreams on the down low and work for what we agree on. Something that Congress could take page out of Libertarians as a whole need gatekeeping to keep us from idiot authoritarians (i.e conservatives) who try to identify as being libertarian. Because of cons, everyone who isn't libertarian always associates libertarianism as a whole with conservativism and believes they are the same despite the fact they'r

  from here https://escholarship.org/content/qt6c14j4fw/qt6c14j4fw_noSplash_1cf44456a31d06c8005a24b1a3188ce5.pdf In the context of these problems with queer theory, Patricia Hill Collins’s black feminist standpoint theory gives us reasons to resist neutrality in coalitional politics. Collins argues that we should place black women’s “oppositional consciousness” at the center of coalitional politics. A problem arises here because, according to standpoint theory, the notion of a central oppositional consciousness—perhaps the Lumpenproletariat, queerness, or blackness—is a limit of standpoint-intersectionality that exceeds the determinate self-consciousness necessary for sustained political agency. Different theorists elect different ostensible identity differences as actual failures of identity in general to the place of this general limit with a trajectory beyond intersectional identity. To this limit where identity fails in general, at times Marxists have elected class differences, que

 ovarit .com It seems that LGBTQ + has turned into a secular religion instead of being a shorthand acronym for a community of people with a shared purpose (which is the original meaning behind the LGBTQ+).  Now the different sects of the LGBTQ+ are all about bringing in as many people under the LGBTQ+ banner as they can get, the majority of whom have nothing in common I find it pathetic that a heterosexual monogamous woman for example can claim more letters on the LGBTQ+ movement than most gays and lesbian  It is a religion that quickly turns into a cult for many. Sometimes there are too many traits and conditions that fall under the LGBTQ+ banner including PCOS and Queer can mean anything if someone gets carried away with finding new labels to identify as Queer Why are there letters on the LGBTQ+ spectrum that represent totally unrelated things under the same umbrella?  Some straight people have never been oppressed for their sexual orientation and what is the whole point of having “q

   While I generally agree with the message in this image, I feel also that if we replace the term 'wage slavery' in this image with the term 'taxation', that in some more specific situations even after that change, the message in this image would be true too. https://www.reddit.com/r/Libertarian/comments/tfair/xpost_from_rsocialism_replace_wageslavery_with/

https://www.reddit.com/r/stupidpol/comments/qz0j63/why_does_the_left_seem_to_hate_stoicism/    Work in progress In Mark Fischer’s Capitalist Realism, Fischer says that much of the left has come to accept the conclusion that capitalism is something that will stay, so the efforts of the left (or at least Liberal 2.0) have changed from dismantling capitalist institutions to mitigating whatever inevitable effects of it occur. This is like a stoic perspective of capitalism, where they come to accept the influence and nature of capitalism as out of their control, so their goals switch from their original motive. In that respect, the philosophy of stoicism does not mesh with a struggle that requires dismantling of that system of Capitalism which appears to be inevitable, seeing how much it’s being propagandized to be in tune with human nature.  Like in a broader sense, stoicism appears to have internal contradiction with people who are in a struggle, and so a purpose.  However a lot of people