Polikckin Me

NGOs (Liberal 2.0, and non Liberal 2.0 alike  like Jewish NGOs like WJC splc and ADL ) have too much  influence  over our society. We shouldn’t have to bend the knee to NGOs ( andrew torba bend kneee jews gab )every time they whine about something us non Liberal 2.0s say that triggers them. The NGOs need to put in checked reduce their power and influence . NGOs even influence each other. Most NGOs are Liberal 2.0ers and we need to go after them and stop their abuse  The SPLC has done great work for decades and is generally a good tool for info on hate groups but in the past decade (especially since they wrongly fired Morris Dees) they have a Liberal 2.0 bias, at least outside of their info on hate groups.  They are seen by some to be almost a some scam and should be taken with a grain of salt after the acts they pulled over the years  The SPLC listing pro life groups and Traditionalist Catholic groups as hate groups is proof they are moving towards being a smear campaign designed to de

  What is or isn't offensive?  Liberal 2.0ers use to believe in free speech but now they have gone mad and are against it. “Political correctness is America's newest form of intolerance, and it is especially pernicious because it comes disguised as tolerance. It presents itself as fairness, yet attempts to restrict and control people's language with strict codes and rigid rules. I'm not sure that's the way to fight discrimination. I'm not sure silencing people or forcing them to alter their speech is the best method for solving problems that go much deeper than speech”  George Carlin “If liberty means anything at all it means the right to say things others don’t want to hear” and to quote Betrand Russell on freedom of speech “ The fundamental argument for freedom of opinion is the doubtfulness of all our belief... when the State intervenes to ensure the indoctrination of some doctrine, it does so because there is no conclusive evidence in favour of that doctrine

  Big Tech censorship I support  this letter, its message and I add my signature to this letter  . I also echo  this article on it too I critique single-issue campaigns or orientations in the realm of idpol/ cancel culture   left anarchism subreddit sidebar I will give the cancel culture warriors this minor acknowledgement; it is understandable that companies like big tech use canceling of users to avoid being associated with controversial views .  But the fact they virtue signal about how they canceled such people for ‘moral’ reasons or to ‘protect protected groups’ means I will never even give those companies the benefit of the doubt.  Cancel Culture is only a problem because of employment-at-will. https://www.reddit.com/r/stupidpol/comments/obm3x9/why_wont_the_establishment_press_accept_any/  Here  is a similar point on Cancel culture  I am against Cancel culture as much as the IDW are against it and I echo a lot of their views on cancel culture . Cancel culture persecutes people fo

 critical theory reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/CriticalTheory/comments/wg3olg/what_the_woke_left_and_the_altright_share_by/  I use the words wokeness and wokeism interchangeably throughout my blogs. Use the terms 'wokeness/wokeism' for lack of a better word . I do not have a fairly substantial vocabulary, so it is hard for me to find ways to describe the wokeness/wokeism phenomenon  (unlike rightoids, when I use said words, I am not appropriating that language from liberation movements and flipping it)    Right wingers aim their fire at wokeism because they want to attract people and they know workers are not down with that stuff (and for good reason).  Cries against “wokism”  may be banal but I also think there is sometimes an emperors new clothes situation where people don’t actually want to talk about it (so I will) Criticism against wokeism and idpol, and especially putting it forward as some great 'threat' of the current age, beyond its political ramifications (I